艺术品收藏家艾德琳（帕特里克·波查 Patrick Bauchau 饰）来到朋友丹尼尔（Daniel Pommereulle 饰）的海边别墅度假，在这里，他遇见了漂亮的女孩海蒂（哈蒂·波丽托弗 Haydée Politoff 饰）。丹尼尔告诉艾德琳，海蒂是个生活作风颇为开放的女孩，有许多个风格迥异的男友，艾德琳和朋友在背后戏称她为“收集男人的女人”。艾德琳崇尚健康、自然、克制的生活方式，这样的他自然瞧不起海蒂的放浪形骸，但同时，他发现自己又总是不经意的注意着海蒂，这个女孩的一举一动能够轻易的牵动他的情绪，并且，海蒂似乎对自己也心怀好感。没想到，海蒂选择的居然是自己的好友丹尼尔，这让艾德琳心里很不是滋味，他离开别墅回归到自己的生活，却仍然和海蒂保持着藕断丝连的关系。在法国这个热情浪漫的城市里，一对男女对待感情兜兜转转遮遮掩掩，艾德琳是否会成为海蒂的下一个“收藏品”呢？

　　法国著名大导演 @亨利-乔治·克鲁佐 执导的经典法庭悬疑片，由一代银幕性感女神 @碧姬·芭铎 领衔主演。
　　影片通过一起诉讼案件，向观众讲述了一对青年男女之间炽热奔放、大胆自由、无拘无束、歇斯底里的爱情故事。
　　@亨利-乔治·克鲁佐 在片中使用了极具跳跃感的剪辑手法，这非但没有破坏叙事节奏，其特点反而与男女主人公之间充满张力与撕裂的感情纠葛一脉相承，为影片加分不少。

　　皮埃尔（吉约姆·卡内 Guillaume Canet 饰）是一名障碍马术运动员，在他不算短暂的职业生涯中，皮埃尔的表现一直都中规中矩，只是一个名不见经传的小小骑手。直到有一天，皮埃尔与那匹名叫贾普璐的黑色公马邂逅了，在机缘巧合之下，他们都改变了彼此的命运。
　　贾普璐曾经是被作为骑兵团的英雄马来驯养的，然而，因为它的体格天生就比同种的其他马矮小，因此常常受到嘲笑。刚开始，皮埃尔并不相信贾普璐的能力，但随着时间的推移，贾普璐用自己的实力赢得了皮埃尔的尊重。因为它拥有较小的身材，所以能够更加灵活的穿梭躲避障碍。在皮埃尔和贾普璐天衣无缝的配合之下，一人一马获得了无数的荣誉和奖牌。

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�
　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.
　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.
　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

　　外交官杜米尼克·奥法尔任命为“南北交换机构”的法国代表。这一机构是一个拥有巨大权力的国际组织。有个代码为“奥林匹”的情报机构，将杜米尼克·奥法尔夫妇确定为“51号”和“52号”，他们搜集了解“51号”的全部档案资料，伺机采取行动。影片主要表现了这个机关特工人员介绍“51号”的有关情况，他的家庭，经历，私生活等等，并最终说明他如何别人暗害。

　　Ralph Burton is a miner who is trapped for several days as a result of a cave-in. When he finally manages to dig himself out, he realizes that all of mankind seems to have been destroyed in a nuclear holocaust. He travels to New York City only to find it deserted. Making a life for himself there, he is flabbergasted to eventually find Sarah Crandall, who also managed to survive. Together, they form a close friendship until the arrival of Benson Thacker who has managed to pilot his small boat into the city's harbor. At this point the tensions rise between the three, particularly between Thacker, who is white and Burton, who is black.

　　法国绅士马德奥（费尔南多•雷依 Fernando Rey 饰）在西班牙乘车回国，在车厢里他遇到了一对母女、一个侏儒以及一个弟弟的朋友。火车发动前，一个女人（莫利纳•安赫拉 Molina Angela 饰）拎着行李匆匆赶来，马德奥向她泼了一桶冷水，这让众人颇为不解。回到车厢后，马德奥跟其他人讲述自己的遭遇：原来这女人是马德奥哥哥家的西班牙女仆孔奇塔（卡洛尔•布盖 Carole Bouquet 饰）。她的美貌深深吸引了马德奥。为了示爱，他资助孔齐塔母女摆脱经济困难，然后提出让她做自己的爱人。虽然，孔奇塔对他半推半就，但是始终没有答应他的性要求。这令他非常恼火，特别是当他发现这个自称处女的女人居然另有情人时，更是怒不可遏……
　　本片中，西班牙导演布努埃尔用两名女演员扮演同一角色，颇具象征意义。

　　导演克里斯托夫·巴拉蒂继处女作《放牛班的春天》之后再次演绎合唱团的故事， 怀旧的情绪，热情洋溢的人物，竖立起了一座法式平民电影的丰碑，甫一上映，再创票房佳绩。
　　本片发生的背景为1935年至1937年的法国。当时正是法国“人民前线”(popular front)运动高峰时期，法国国际工会(SFIO)第一次带领工人阶级取得了国家的合法政权。在一批社会主义积极分子的领导下，当时的法国社会上上下下开始了一系列的工人权益斗争运动。劳资关系变得空前的紧张。在普遍的罢工和呼吁改革的压力下，许多工人确实得到了福利及待遇的提高。但是，在很多地方，工人的待遇不但没有提高，反而因为工厂的倒闭以及当时的经济大萧条而陷入了更加艰苦的境地。
　　本片的主人公剧院舞台经理辟谷(杰拉尔·朱诺饰演)便是深受打击的一位。而祸不单行的是他的老婆也在这个时候背叛了他，跟着别的男人跑了，只留他和儿子相依为命。谁知，儿子因为上街拉手风琴卖艺，自己指控无抚养能力，儿子也因此被行政机关强制带走。同时，辟谷所在的剧院也被当地的官员查封，他彻底的陷入了绝望的境地。
　　若是辟谷在这个时候选择一死了之故事也就没什么说的了，戏剧性的是他在遭受打击之后并没有选择就此沉沦，相反他重新鼓舞了斗志，并且想要自己组织一场戏剧演出以此来振奋自己的生活。于是他找来了同样已经失业的古怪的歌舞男杰克·杰克特和理想主义的革命青年埃米尔。随后他们开始自己动手修缮了破败的剧院，组织了一群失业青年来共同加入他们。并且还意外的找到了色艺俱佳的女演员杜丝。所有参加这场演出的人都没有收到任何的报酬，可是大家的热情同样十分高涨。因为这场演出，让许多人的生命中重新有了希望。

　　《迫害》讲述了一个名叫丹尼尔的35岁男子，成天忙于工作。但如此繁忙的日子并没有让他感到充实，相反，他依然感到十分孤独。他有一个于之并不登对的女人索妮娜，两人总是分分合合，可当有一天一个陌生男人突然出现在他的公寓、索妮娜提出要离开他时，丹尼尔才感到了问题的严重性。他不知道这个男子是谁，与索妮娜究竟是什么关系，但他自己糟糕透顶的生活状况，也确实无法给任何人带来安全感，于是只能被动地生存下去。

　　In order to escape from her former lover Marc, Sylvia goes to Brazil where Dr. Santamo transforms her into the beautiful Emmanuelle. With this new identity comes a sexual awakening which is complicated by her memories of Marc. As with other entries in this series, the plot twists provide ample opportunities to expose the characters.

　　19世纪末，一位俄罗斯姑娘为了追寻作为极地科学和探险家的祖父的足迹，而毅然决然地放弃父母安排的婚礼，踏上冒险征程！

　　在巴黎的郊区，人们与世隔绝。当代社会闯入了这个世界，收音机里播放着恐怖主义的消息，外国人掠夺财产，贪婪的亲戚也成了帮凶。当那个谁也管不住的堡主的堂亲Sophie死去的时候，局面变得紧张起来，那些继承者为了钱财展开了斗争。

　　玛蒂离家多年，弟弟担负起照顾家中重病母亲的责任。无数的日子过去，玛蒂的房间仍维持原样，时间好似因思念而静止在她离家的那一刻。有天玛蒂突然返家，即便当年的不满情绪依然存在，面对母亲即将不久人世，过往相处的回忆让她选择重拾亲情的温暖羁绊。本片为导演首部长片作品，取材自身经历，以充满诗意的画面诉说对母亲的情感。

　　朱丽叶特（Kristin Scott Thomas 饰）亲手杀死了自己只有6岁的儿子，她被判入狱15年，期间丈夫与之离婚，父母和她断绝关系，只有小妹妹莉偷偷思念着疼爱自己的姐姐。
　　15年后，朱丽叶特出狱，暂住莉（Elsa Zylberstein 饰）的家中。因其犯罪背景，朱丽叶特在求职过程中处处碰壁，妹夫卢克（Serge Hazanavicius 饰）也对她心存芥蒂。随着时间推移，冰冷自闭的朱丽叶特逐渐和妹妹一家人相处融洽，工作步入正轨，也有了心仪之人。这时，莉却无意中得知了姐姐亲手杀死孩子的真相……
　　本片荣获2009英国学院奖最佳非英语片奖、2008柏林国际电影节天主教人道精神奖、2008欧洲电影节最佳女主角奖。

一个烦恼的青春期问题青年雷米Rémy（奥利维耶·巴泰勒米饰）因为红头发成了他周围人恒定的嘲笑对象，并不断为此发生冲突，即便在他的足球队里也不例外。在一次与他姐姐的争吵之后，自闭的雷米离家出走。这样他就搭上了心存一丝苦涩的心理医生帕特里克Patrick（樊尚·卡塞尔饰）的车，不料，也长有一头红发的帕特里克是个愤世嫉俗的人，尽管两人年龄相差甚多，但雷米的境遇却博得了帕特里克的同情。帕特里克决定帮助眼前这个受到众人蔑视的男孩，于是他们走到了一起，一同去面对道德虚伪的世界秩序。雷米挑选了他心目中的自由之地爱尔兰，他希望在那里人们不会用红头发来衡量他的种族身份问题。而帕特里克为了伸展自由意志的界限，意图替代雷米父亲的权利，不顾雷米想法的非常荒谬，反而促成此行。然而，残酷暴力和病态冷漠的世界让憧憬光明前景之行的他们最终成为一对可爱的输家。

　　《救世军》是年轻摩洛哥作家阿卜杜拉·塔亚的导演处女作，根据他的同名自传小说改编。电影以第一人称讲述主人公的成长故事：“我”（Said Mrini 饰）出生在摩洛哥港口一个庞大的家庭中。尽管阿拉伯世界严重恐同，但成年男子也会在私下想办法解决需要。由于“我”的家庭负担严重，懦弱的父亲默许男人们对“我”进行性骚扰以获取物质报酬。强壮的哥哥（Amine Ennaji 饰）是“我”生活中唯一正面的男性形象，因此“我”从小就崇拜和暗恋哥哥。可是当哥哥跟一个酒吧女侍私奔后，“我”的人生从此天翻地覆，直到10年后“我”踏上了去瑞士日内瓦的留学旅途......
　　《救世军》是阿拉伯国家摩洛哥的第一部同志题材电影，入围第70届威尼斯电影节国际影评人周单元。

　　伊夫·蒙当是舞台和电视的双栖明星，他回到阔别了20年的马赛——他年轻时生活的城市，为此马赛大剧院在26日安排了一场名为“我们时代的蒙当”的演出。
　　蒙当是理所当然的主演，女主角是贝蒂·米勒，贝蒂原是香水商店的柜台小姐，怀着明星梦，现在终于实现了……然而，贝蒂的母亲——米莱娜·朗贝尔曾是20年前蒙当的爱人……

　　这是史诗片巨匠冈斯的早期作品，原版长达九个小时。
　　影片讲述一个类似现在电视肥皂剧的故事：铁路工程师从一次车祸中救回一个女孩，把她当作女儿来领养。不料他自己和儿子都对女孩产生好感。为了不让儿子占有她，遂把女孩嫁给了一个富人。但儿子和养女之间有着压制不住的爱情。儿子跟她丈夫发生争执，不幸死亡。老人把儿子的死归咎于养女，不愿再见到她。后来他眼睛瞎了，养女偷偷回来照料他，直至为他送终。
　　影片的革命性表现在如下方面：开场的火车事故蒙太奇采用快速剪辑，极具震撼力；平庸的剧情中增加了大量文学典故，丰富了内涵；摄影和剪辑均具有一定的形式感，如镜头的节奏跟音乐相吻合，画面中的机器被用作现代化的象征等，开启了“纯电影”的先河。片名指命运的轮回、欲望的轮回，由车轮形象来暗示。

　　影片讲述的是一个爱情故事。一个30岁的男人和一个女人生活在一间带家具的狭小出租公寓内。男人有个女儿，是一个他抛弃过的女人所生。他会去看望女儿，女孩与生母一起独居，男子不提供分文赡养费，女子不得不外出工作抚养女孩。这个男人是一个戏剧演员，他的生活非常窘迫。他疯狂地爱上了另 外一个女人，这个女人曾经红极一时，但现在却没有工作。男人利用一切可以利用的方法，找所有能帮她的人，但是一切努力都完全无用。

　　Nina和Madeleine是两位退休老人，也是深爱彼此数十载的恋人。在外人眼中，她们只是普通邻居，直到女儿无意中发现了她们的秘密……对于Nina和Madeleine来说，爱情是生活必需品，是野性的，是冲动的。年龄没有扑灭她们炽热的爱情火焰，或许正相反。
　　本片以老年拉拉这个经常被忽视的群体为着眼点，以情感的方式探讨在生命的尽头，她们如何面对疾病、家庭和、

1900年的巴黎，妓院普萝奈像一座宫廷一样，成为寒夜里最温暖的地方。波莉娜·德埃（Iliana Zabeth 饰）刚十五岁半，写了封自荐信要求到妓院工作，声称希望“自由”；美丽的玛莲娜（Alice Barnole 饰）遇上一个肯给她蓝宝石的客人，她以为是爱情，却迎来把她割成笑面人的刀子；朱莉（Jasmine Trinca 饰）不幸染上梅毒，老相好只给她写来情意绵绵的信，放任她死亡，只有姐妹们哭泣……妓院里浮光掠影着百年前的种种，男人和贵族们的奇怪欲望，女人们被持续物化，虐恋和疾病永不止息，假面舞会要终结怎样的痛苦……

　　一部有关阴谋政变的豪华传记片，取材自1930年代法国的一个真实的故事。风流潇洒的主人公是一位法国籍俄国犹太人，他曾以诈骗罪被捕入狱，出来后改名换姓四处行骗，从事非法的投机活动，最终控制了全巴黎的新闻出版界、跑马场、政界以及豪华的社交场所。他还是个不折不扣的赌徒。最终丑闻败露，与之一起倒台的还有许多受牵连的政府官员。他在追捕中不得不自杀。而这一事件同时也暴露了法国政界的内幕和丑闻，加剧了内部派系的斗争，使得法国政府经历了一次严重的政治危机，差点就垮台了。
　　影片通过这样一个在上流社会靠行骗耍手段而飞黄腾达的骗子故事，来检视在那段经济不景气、人心彷徨的年代中人性的趋向和人的精神状况。中间还插入了苏联流亡人士托洛茨基来法国寻求庇护的内容，跟史塔维斯基组成鲜明的对比。编导目的在于暗喻法国政治取向的两种极端方向。桑德海姆的音乐恰到好处地配合了画面。

　　给你一个三分钟，你会拍出怎样的电影？
　　本片由35位知名导演，为庆祝戛纳电影节六十周年而拍摄的三分钟短片组成。细心的你会发现，在此短篇集中不仅有众多知名演员的参演，更有著名导演的客串演出。这短暂的三分钟光影，不仅浓缩了精妙的生活片段，更有每位导演对电影、对人生的深刻体悟。 或温情或冷峻或真实或迷幻，人生何止五味，《每个人都有他自己的电影》如是说，你的呢？

　　本片叙述一对男女的爱情故事，重心在于德纳芙扮演的女主角埃里娜，她有天开车撞倒了过马路的吉勒尔，但意外令两人结识并播下缘分。吉勒尔被美艳有气质的埃里娜所陶醉而展开追求，但她却拒人于千里外，冷漠而孤僻，似乎隐藏着难解心事。吉勒尔用尽方式打破了她的藩篱，并与之倾诉心事秘密，一个原来平静安稳的世界瞬时破灭。